ARE WE POSSIBLY LOOKING AT THE MOST EXQUISITE PLAYING OUT OF THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC IN ORDER TO BRING THE USA INTO GLOBAL GOVERNMENT WITHOUT FIRING A SHOT?
(Citizen call for United Nations (global) medical research intervention?)
Create problem: Corona Virus
People scream/call for help. Fear/anger/hysteria/dismay exists nationwide due to President Trump (USA Center for Disease Control, govt. unprofessional/ineffective response to virus,and media constant barrage of news re international financial collapse and possible global worldwide Corona Virus epidemic.)
Impose solution: Imposition of United Nations international/global medical virus research coalition which in effect becomes excuse for permanent global government without firing a shot… something world’s “little people” (all of us) would never have accepted had the crisis not been deliberately created by the coalition of global elitists whose goal has always been global government.
HISTORY OF EFFORTS TO BRING USA INTO GLOBAL GOVERNMENT:
The late Edith Kermit Roosevelt, grand daughter of President Theodore Roosevelt, in her Between the Lines–Research Program, January 5, 1963 issue, said:
“The theme of unilateral disarmament is to be made respectable in “A Proposal for a Ban on the Use of Nuclear Weapons.” Oct. 6, 1961. Dr. Morton H. Halperin suggests that even if the Russians don’t disarm we should do so anyway.
“Some of these steps” says Dr. Halperin, “might be taken unilaterally either with the aim of inducing reciprocation or because they are valuable in themselves independent of the Russian response.”
In his IDA Study Memorandum, “Arms Control and Inadvertent War”, March 10, 1996, Dr. Halperin says that in arms control agreements “it might be stressed that inspection was not absolutely necessary” and that “the United States might, in fact, want to invite the Soviets to design the inspection procedures if they seem to be interested in them.”
A man to watch for clues to policy is Dr. Lincoln P. Bloomfield, formerly with the State Department’s disarmament staff and now director of the Arms Control Project at the Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in IDA Research Memorandum No 6, “The Politics of Arms control: Troika, Veto and International Institutions” Oct. 6, 1961, Dr. Bloomfield points out that “short of a major catastrophe the difficulties in obtaining widespread public approval and explicit Senate ratification of a genuine world government are obvious.”
“How then can federal government planners bypass the will of the American people and their elected representatives?” Through disarmament negotiations. According to Dr. Bloomfield:
“In a World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations”, March 10, 1962, Dr. Bloomfield explains that “without disarmament such a system of world government is probably unobtainable.”
And how can the American people be conditioned to accept the State Department plan to eliminate national armies (and personal firearms, c.i.) and replace them with a U.N. police force”?”
“If it (world government) came about as a series of unnerving trips to or over the brink, it would come about at any time”, according to Dr. Bloomfield.
WORLD GOVERNMENT is to be presented to the American people as the only answer to a war in which they would suffer unacceptable destruction or could not win.
The definition of war could easily be expanded to include viral/chemical wars) as well.
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” ~ Henry Kissinger